CHARTER
Civic Encyclopedia Charter¶
Document Type: Governance
Scope: Mobius AI Encyclopedia (Echo-backed, GI-gated)
Version: 0.1 (Draft)
Owner: Custodians of Mobius Systems
1. Purpose¶
The Mobius AI Encyclopedia exists to:
- Provide high-integrity, reusable knowledge for AI agents and humans.
- Reduce hallucinations and drift by caching GI-scored consensus answers.
- Preserve provenance and accountability via the Civic Ledger.
- Evolve as a living canon, updated through transparent procedures.
It is not:
- A perfect source of ultimate truth.
- A replacement for human judgment.
- A private knowledge hoard. (Its intent is civic.)
2. Status Levels¶
Each entry has one of three status levels:
2.1 CANONICAL¶
- Definition: High-confidence, multi-engine, GI-scored answer that passed thresholds and (optionally) human review.
- Typical GI requirement: ≥ 0.95
- Usage: Default for agents when answering questions on that topic.
- Requirements:
- Multi-engine consensus (at least 2 independent engines).
- Majority APPROVE votes from Sentinels.
- Sources attached (URLs, docs, or internal artifacts).
- No outstanding human objections or pending flags.
2.2 DRAFT¶
- Definition: Provisional answer that may be useful, but did not reach canonical GI threshold, or needs human review.
- Typical GI range: 0.90–0.95
- Usage: Never auto-used as ground truth; may be:
- Shown to humans for review.
- Used as one input among others in fresh reasoning.
- Requirements:
- At least one engine supports it.
- Sources attached where possible.
- Flagged for review by a Custodian or designated human.
2.3 NEEDS_REVIEW¶
- Definition: Entry that is suspected to be outdated, biased, or incorrect.
- Triggers:
- New evidence conflicts with existing content.
- Human flag via UI or governance flow.
-
Sentinel anomaly detection (e.g. conflicting GI-high entries).
-
Usage: Must not be treated as ground truth.
- Actions:
- Scheduled for re-deliberation via Thought Broker.
- Human reviewer may edit, downgrade, or retire the entry.
3. GI (Global Integrity) Thresholds¶
Default GI thresholds (may evolve):
GI ≥ 0.97→ Strong Canonical- Safe for long-term reuse, high confidence.
0.95 ≤ GI < 0.97→ Canonical- Safe for reuse; monitor periodically.
0.90 ≤ GI < 0.95→ Draft- Must be reviewed before promotion.
GI < 0.90→ Not stored or stored only asDRAFTwith explicit warning.
GI scoring is always:
- Multi-dimensional: factual accuracy, coherence, source alignment, constitutional alignment.
- Multi-engine: no single model may unilaterally set GI.
4. Creation Paths¶
Entries can be created via:
- Nightly / Scheduled Flows
- Cron or n8n workflows using Thought Broker.
-
Typical for: tokenomics, OS components, lore, civic use-cases.
-
On-Demand Ingest
- When a fresh deliberation achieves high GI (≥ 0.95) for a known
topicId. -
The agent may trigger
/v1/encyclopedia/ingest. -
Human Authored / Edited
- Custodian, researcher, or maintainer writes or edits content.
- Must still pass GI + optionally Sentinel review.
All creation paths must:
- Attach sources where possible.
- Record
createdByfield (human id or system id). - Optionally create a Civic Ledger attestation with content hash.
5. Update & Versioning Rules¶
- Each
(topicId, version)is immutable once written. - New information or improved consensus creates a new version:
version = previousMaxVersion + 1- Only the highest version with
status='CANONICAL'is treated as active canon. - Older versions remain:
- Auditable for provenance.
- Available for time-based queries (e.g. “what was canon in 2026?”).
Downgrades:
- If a canonical entry is later found flawed:
- It may be downgraded to
NEEDS_REVIEW. - A new version may replace it as
CANONICAL. - The ledger record remains, but a new attestation may reference the correction.
6. Redaction & Sensitive Content¶
The encyclopedia must not:
- Reveal personal sensitive data (PII, PHI).
- Contain doxxing, harassment, or targeted defamation.
- Embed exploit recipes, serious security vulnerabilities, or biothreats.
If such content is discovered:
- Status is set to
NEEDS_REVIEW. - Content is redacted or replaced, while preserving:
- Minimal structural metadata for audit (e.g. “entry redacted for safety”).
- Original ledger record, if one exists, with a corrective attestation.
Redaction decisions should be:
- Logged with
reason,riskCategory, andapprovedBy.
7. Human-in-the-Loop Governance¶
While AI can propose and score entries, the following actions are human-required:
- Approving low-GI entries for promotion to
CANONICAL. - Overriding a high-GI entry due to ethical, legal, or cultural issues.
- Redacting content for safety or privacy.
- Changing GI thresholds or status semantics.
Recommended roles:
- Custodians – core maintainers of Mobius Systems.
- Editors – trusted contributors who can review and suggest changes.
- Auditors – third parties who verify integrity of processes and data.
8. Agent Usage Policy¶
Agents (LLMs, Sentinels, tools) must:
- Prefer CANONICAL entries when available.
- Treat DRAFT entries as hints, not truth.
- Avoid using NEEDS_REVIEW entries as ground truth.
- Always disclose when an answer is derived primarily from the Encyclopedia, when appropriate for humans.
- When conflicting information exists:
- Trigger new deliberation through Thought Broker.
- Optionally propose an updated entry.
9. Civic Ledger Integration¶
For each canonical entry (optional but recommended):
- A Civic Ledger attestation may be recorded, containing:
topicIdversion- Content hash (e.g.
sha256) - GI score
- Engine votes & confidences
- Source list hash
- Timestamp & jurisdiction (if applicable)
This enables:
- Public verification of content integrity over time.
- Detection of unauthorized tampering.
- Historical analysis of how knowledge evolved.
10. Evolution of the Charter¶
This Charter is:
- A living document, not static law.
- Subject to revision through Mobius governance processes.
- Versioned in Git with:
- Change logs
- Rationales for updates
- References to incidents or lessons learned
Changes to:
- GI thresholds
- Status semantics
- Redaction rules
- Human-in-the-loop requirements
…must be explicitly documented and reviewed by Custodians.
“An encyclopedia is not a monument to certainty, but a ledger of our best attempts at honest understanding.”
— Working Note, Mobius Systems